Or, if you believe the authors of your articles, stop spreading their names further. You can't have it both ways and claim some kind of integrity. There has been some improvement Now, in defending Ripoff Report, Beebe also recounted other areas where the site has moved, pointing out that they will now redact victims' names in some cases: “Notwithstanding the above, in [an] effort to help address some issues we were seeing, Ripoff Report implemented and tested different policies. For example, with our court order policy, so long as the order complies with the same,
Ripoff Report will remove specifically identified information that has been found to be false and defamatory by the court and placed in an editorial comment explaining the situation. . If there are instances of harassment/bullying/pure harassment and we jewelry retouching service get enough information (often accompanied by a police report and/or other information) when we, in our discretion, perceive it to be so , we will update the post under our test / Piloting a Perceived Harassment Policy… Indeed, Reluctantly, I agree: The Ripoff Report has improved in this respect and is a little less disgusting now. They redacted the name of my revenge porn client
from the article her stalker had posted on the site as a concrete case. It was a good decision and it's a step in the right direction. I congratulate them. But, unfortunately for the revenge porn victim, Google hadn't updated their search results to exclude their name from appearing in cached versions of the page, or prevent the article from appearing as a result. searches on her name (which it wouldn't) must be done when the page was de-indexed), so when Ripoff Report changed its URLs, the article defaming her abruptly reappeared at the top of the search results. So while they helped her on the one hand by