At 3:00 pm on May 13, 2011, the Constitutional Court pronounced the verdict on the Laizhu case. The judge believed that the authority of the safety tolerance standard rests with the central government, and it is constitutional for the central government to inform the local standards that the local standard is invalid. The following is a brief introduction to the case and the reasons for the verdict. , the chief writer of this case is Justice Huang Zhaoyuan.
the occurrence of disputes Chiayi City Council, Taichung City Council, Taipei City Council, and Tainan City Council, from May 105 to September 2016, successively photo retouching service stipulated in their own autonomy regulations that pork and products sold within their jurisdictions should not be detected for type B Receptor hormone (commonly known as clenbuterol, one of which is ractopamine), has been approved by the Ministry of Health and Welfare to take effect. On September 17, 109, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the competent authority of the Food Sanitation Management Law, issued the "Standards for Residues of Animal Drugs", which set the residue standards for ractopamine.
The new standards came into effect on January 1, 110. Article 30, Paragraph 1 of the "Local System Law" stipulates: "The self-government regulations and the Constitution, laws, or regulations based on the authorization of the law, or the self-government regulations of higher-level self-government groups shall be invalid." Paragraph 3 stipulates that if the conflict occurs, the violation shall be invalid. The Executive Yuan, the competent central authorities, and the county government will issue a letter respectively. In addition, Article 26, Paragraph 4 also stipulates that if there are penalties in the self-government regulations, they should be issued after the approval of the Executive Yuan and the central competent authority. One day before the central governm